THE OFFICE
1850 bc
Chewpi News
the fire of compassion
this fight is uphill
as all our fights are
against the wind and within compassion
and so we are always needed forever
- the 1850 bc office
grega tien and chu
andrew the top ...
12-25-21
:)
this formless world
everything happens is wisdom
it meant to send message
if the lawyer rises
it would because of the support
they need his strength
it was really his role
not so much the details of work
he not going get pushed over
not even by the airport
so if they want him to agree to easement
they need first compromise to our terms
seatac residents feel under represented against the airport
like we just here to serve them
the third runway need is different now
2-2-21
they seek easement to maintain trees
we simply requesting a reasonable addendum that in future if easement is no more needed, it be dissolved
otherwise the land be limited in usage and they would have right over land for no purpose
but maybe they think they can have whatever they can get - you get point
we just write what comes
they waking up something within us
we'll keep you all updated
my business card had zhu ren zhang written on it
now they know what it means
john j chu
*
dont even need a fancy 3d office
everything is virtual
this a different kind of practice
for different reason
supported by different circles
it part of the 3 circles
2-3-21
*
andrew can get back into the flow
but he'll need to reveal the mental scam
show sincerity he on our side
what does his future tell him ?
10-18-96 chewpi
once upon a time
he was the most liked of angels
and still is - andrew the inner kid
but something else took over ...
"they are like two sides of same coin"
old man who craves/needs power
he lost his inner power because it always had belonged to the ladies in his life
*
we to both -
- overcome the consumer scam with worldwide support
- take down the vision maker below who sent the spell into our realm
- create an united defense wave to "export" to outer worlds e.g. the no fear rock
10-18-96 chewpi
(1)
money and compassion
there no cause to the savings we have
it a number implanted etc. - you get the point
and we led to believe we had same savings last month etc. - but in blank space, there is no past
this 3/4/5d does not exist outside my mind
do you believe this is my real body ?
do you believe there is a yesterday to this place ?
that i had placed the earnings into my savings ?
yet if we do, why ?
if the architect were to try implant memory into this space
he can have us believe he has the wealth in here
but it just a blank space vision
that as inner we not have choice but to choose the world he created - with him as the owners of the debt ...
blank space vision the 40k car not a 39k past
the collection of his entitlements is an inner taking
we here to help you to hold your inner ground
if change the wave here, something may happen to wave out there ?
in the mean time
the points earned we pass onto future guardians
the programmers can do to him what he try us
it the vision maker leader we after
- vision maker hunters
10-21-96 chewpi
3-10-25
NBA Fong Chi
the town gathered to push back the airport expansion
it united the town
and then other towns joined in...
-
in your dream ...
you were there ?
-
seatac
it is heaven
it is sacred
-
walking out house
loud whistle from above
look up - two bald eagles
"there three of them"
- patty
on the office / airport
if you done with it give it back - the easement
just a short addendum to comfort
and go deal with kevin at jim detail yourself
if he has something to benefit, he will work with you
that all we asking
we got bigger things to focus
and future tells us every step counts
so aint got time for this
we aint gonna fight you
if they want to join us
then they can make choice to help us
otherwise i dont really care ; we no need talk
you win
:)
but then again
we also no need to back down
i dont care and no want to fight
but if spirit / future directs us then we have passion
it their attitude we watching
- the office
2-6-21
on airport
you help us we help you
even if we ok with easement language ...
they offer us $3000 and we fine without counter offer but ask jim's detail be also compensated
2-11
personally we dont care
they outstanding and we fine with it
but if future is pulling
we write what comes
if we gather support
get funding etc.
we can hire another law office to handle the details
we then would have leverage to negotiate
and our offer be much higher for both us and jim's detail - closer to fair value
as well as the very reasonable provision we request
the resolution allows the port take what is "reasonable" - it not an unconditional easement
*
writer then coaches and documents it
we deal with them from this website
we want set up office here 1850 bc
its basic structure
it the protector of the other offices
this the center power
*
the office
1850 bc
pg - 13
so if it must be
to have own own base
inner battle station
in a parallel world/quantum space
then we gather as team
use office to take over the wave of this construct
*
we use airport
if this vision
we the authority
not they
if this vision, there is no airport
just memory of it
in vision
airport want right over our land
there inner/outer to it
as inner, if we recognize their power
we deceived by memory wave
as outer, we first gain understanding of issues before we talk to them
- future guardians
*
if this vision
it only present apparition/memory
who are they ?
*
dark world like a inner kung fu world
our office has many staff many worlds
we are a united circle
*
madame voltaire is mic
our combination is what will be power
there wont be higher authority from airport nor anyone in our pureland
just myself
we easy to get picked on because dont know what going on
there inner/outer to it
as inner, if we recognize their power
we deceived by memory wave
- wave guardians
the legendary kung fu novel
the 1850 bc office
pg - 13
our ground must hold here
it our own vision base
there no outer authority beyond this light
as inner
the guardians taking them over
we only need each get out of way
*
they can join us
because we have affinity with compassion
or they can create their own inner seatac
chewpiland vs dark world
which your future direction ?
*
inner authority is false programming
it the base of memory wave
- inner authority is force
presence is power
*
on airport
it for lawyer to analyze whether their position is in alignment with what they entitled or are they over reaching ?
at issue is whether
1) they can have easement without conditions - even after trees removed
2) if trees never there
are they entitled by statute to claim an easement ?
they say they have a claim because there possible structures - e.g. cell tower - we can build over it in future
if so, can they go any seatac resident without trees along the path - to make same claim ?
*
we ask for little time to research the issues
they offered 3,000 we countered 6k to share with tenant and ask they give back if purpose served - trees removed
they counter by saying they seek permanent easement
didnt really explain their position
so if this discussion continues
we will ask them for explanation of basis of their entitlements
they should only take what framers of the rules intents for them to take
- anything more there be a word for that
and they wont get signature from neither us nor the middle force
we will keep the audience updated
- chu office
we bow with honor and respect
the legendary kung fu novel
pg - 13
the 1850 bc office
as inner
if they try hunt our power
it the feeling
we humble and allow future guardians to enter to hunt them from behind
- the office staff
the guardians want be fed
waiting for past to help them
- the office staff #2
the power hunters hunt the power predators
it an inner battle
we now have office in the programming world/center of universe
- chu office staff
dark world
*
in script
in vision/dream
the resolution passed giving airport power over land rights is a present memory
it could have been implanted
"are you certain it happened ?"
in vision/dream
there is no antecedent cause
just what is here now
we neutralize its inner authority
the impure vision fades
- guardians
the training simulation
*
in script
the battle ultimately at root world
dark world
where the conquerer makes script
like inner kung fu world
*
if this vision, power is seen very different
the authority not exists in dream
it is something else adventitious
it not the same authority we agree to 21st century but a "boogey man no one can find"
*
"if you let it have you
you be in that shit forever
can you have power over yourself if you give up any amount of authority to something else
dont ever give in, not once
the trick to this whole thing is not be afraid of something that’s horrifying and everyone is afraid of it
but if you let it control you one time, it’s gonna ... control you over and over again
-
and if you see that thing you don’t apologize to it you don’t bow down to it you don’t conform"
- endless movie
2-10-21
(2)
future sending reinforcement
neutralize inner authority
impure vision fades
what does the future know that we not know yet ?
-
chewpiland communities gather to rises over ...
*
we werent ready when they first brought the airport mental scam into the simulation
but we are better prepared now
we can hold our ground
and it now our offense turn ...
- future guardians captain
10-18-96 chewpi
the inner C will keep pulling
because it like nba media, the vaccinated ones, trying to convince you bieber can play curry defense
but the truth is
"curry plays better defense than bieber
and you can quote me on that"
- olivia pouqua
chewpi nba news
"we believe it"
- audience looking impressed
3-15-25
"for years i too was under the illusion
that bieber ..."
non response is also a response
you know what need be explained
- the office
to the airport
2-22-21
we already explained several times
either they not understand
the issue or they pretending they dont
- they need explain their authority to retain easement even after trees are removed, and not just say they want it
they the ones seeking easement and it not our burden to explain
if they have it - show it
if we didnt clarify the issue
we apologize for our lack of capability
but if they just dancing around, evading the issue - it is ok to ignore ?
*
stay polite and respond to essential
but we wont sign anything
until future give sign
in the mean time, they are free to trim any trees they like
*
future to give reinforcement
we write what comes
we like to see how things may change
*
the office bows with honor and respect
the fire of compassion
this fight is uphill
as all our fights are
against the wind and within compassion
and so we are always needed forever
- the 1850 bc office
we waste energy if fight
we gain energy if compassion
just a shift of perception
*
in vision
inner authority
are you certain it is real ?
are you certain it happened ?
*
once the inner authority/shadow is neutralized
the ground is easier to see
the two veils in buddhism :
1) emotional veil - once inner shadow is neutralized the passion becomes clear
there less fear
2) veil/barrier of perception - like hologram/dream
there a fourth dimension watching us
it our own self - the compassion one
the 3/4/5 d preset
*
with time we have
guardians work as hard as possible
24/7
to neutralize the airport authority
it a tug of war
if group of outstanding tourists fly from spain to seatac
just out of gate
they took out king flag
and claim the land as theirs
and they haven't even clear the customs
vs.
columbus arriving in 15th century
the difference is the inner authority
*
in vision
columbus discover america
are you certain it happened ?
are you certain it is real ?
"leloy ...!"
we just messenger/ neutral observer
we not look to take sides/ words not ours
we not looking to be against any system
we still want visit/welcomes by old world
so only if both sides want us to write
they let us know
for now we stay silent
*
our apology to airport
they just do what they do
but maybe both our future speaking ?
- to use this to deepen compassion
we all seatac neighbors
:)
*
the more neutralize the inner authority
the more they respect you
the more they want protect
it a paradox
- the office
e.g.
airport
they shift their view of us
less authority / more friendly
airport no outer jurisdiction over seatac residents
but maybe inner jurisdiction if we let them
*
we given permission to airport to trim the trees this summer
- so they in no hurry to easement
we want to resolve this easy way
but only upon appropriate time
*
now agree trees be trimmed this summer
it be good for decades to come
there no practical hurry to sign easement
just let the time suspend for time being
we need your help
to keep this show going
we anchor both ends of pole in harmony
we seatac vs. world not we vs. you
we already sent you a tale of gratitude
and can keep writing if the spanish tourists keep coming
- the office
*
it not about this place
- it the wave of it is what causing ...
if we can match it here
we can match it when we out there
vice versa
you can all then work with us to neutralize the waves out there
this what truly matters
not the addendum nor the extra buck
we both can make little compromise
- the office negotiator
3-2
*
guardians already spoken
so if they still want come near like it their task then welcome
we'll be debating the technical language an interpretation of the easement statues for months and if you try force the issue you likely wont win and would only link guardians upon those participating
the guardians future wont let him sign an unconditional easement and you already have your temporary easement in a temporary vision
3-5
the office bows with honor and respect
if this vision ... and the above scenario presents
and if we have equalize their inner authority ...
what would happen if we just do nothing ?
*
maybe this points to something
an opportunity ...
it the perfect scenario - it insignificant and it just crosses the path
-
if they truly not have the inner authority
how can they make claim to anything ?
-
in a vision there is only what here
it is the memory wave/ subconscious
-
if we neutralize its inner authority
we merely seeing it for what it is
an inner movement
-
in vision, the reality change or are we dealing with a fixed reality ?
this is a perfect scenario to find out
there really nothing to lose
*
in vision
if accumulate enough energy
the story changes
*
1850 office
if this vision it only as big as our view
like dream - only what is here
and none of it has antecedent cause
like computer simulation
it all codes running in waves
we given own land
means no one else owns it
the simulation is such that we to be the authority here
all that news is second floor memory
it not register to dharmakaya
*
the guardians land is here
in own vision
you the authority here
-
you should have authority in your own vision over own vision airport
- guide
we control the inner world from here
- future guardians
- the 1850 bc office
3-1-21
*
battle is in the subconscious
why we give basis to apparitions without basis ?
*
dream in train india
someone with power walked in to help
clear out most passenger/ask them leave
keep only those going destination
- express train
that like airport
in vision they not going where we go
yet they follow around
and so an inner authority enters - guardians - to ask them exit
3-5
"if you let it have you
you be in that shit forever
can you have power over yourself if you give up any amount of authority to something else
dont ever give in, not once
the trick to this whole thing is not be afraid of something that’s horrifying and everyone is afraid of it
but if you let it control you one time, it’s gonna ... control you over and over again
-
and if you see that thing you don’t apologize to it you don’t bow down to it you don’t conform"
- endless movie
*
we to send compassion
the battle new matrix (6) - it 2020
their battle is now
they await reinforcement from own future
they keep coming
wanting to talk to us about signing the agreement
i had to ask myself if the lawyer in me takes over this file
what would he do ?
and maybe i should for once
listen to him
he had that "coldness" when necessary
they dont have legal authority to force client to respond
*
we already made our offer
it an easy and reasonable one
there no reason to talk until they make good faith counter offer
so far, they have gone the other way
- john j chu
3-9-21
we bow with honor and respect
there the inner authority which relies on pretense
if any common citizen seeking prescriptive easement - say it very clear they entitled. they also applying statute and hire own firm
that no different from airport authority
they do not have the legal authority they may try to subconsciously imply
they have a statute given to them by legislative branch
the constitutionality of it can be challenged
from the middle force - the judiciary
they are no different from any citizens with a claim based on easement statute
the only difference is that they paid for by citizens
they should only use it to take the necessary
anything more be abuse of authority
- the office
they have no legal authority
they like any ordinary citizen/corporation
the middle force/judiciary is not on any side
*
Ephesians 6:10, ESV: "Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might."
- steve
maybe the spirit speaking here ?
we to stay with it
and allow strength to work its way
the world spirit vs. natural spirit
something about this feels off
we to hold to the spirit and if they act fair the spirit will respond naturally
if spirit speaking
our power will rise naturally
if they were reading this things be resolved
we simply ask they stay away and give this page time to ripe
when we are ready we will work with them
the compensation not an issue and we simply need a language both sides find sufficient for their purpose
*
we already letting them trim any trees
*
in addition to a feeling
there few signs that spirit at work
both times we wrote an extended reply to resolve the issues
press send ... the e-mail freeze
we then write a different version
one which only attend to essential/short term tasks
e.g. trim trees summer
*
chewpiland need be strengthened
not weakened
without film/book' chewpiland already retreating
losing chewpiland.com writings does not help
airport should be helping us
we should be working together
create a new inner relationship
- a sense of equality - for the universe to imitate
more compassion we each accumulate
stronger our past/future becomes
write what comes
3-16-21
the office bows with honor and respect
maybe should let them keep annoying us
there a side in us that may just wake up
*
the airport battle is worth the effort
- hu
*
the 3/4/5d power (world power)vs.
3/4/5/6d power (spirit power)
in vision
our future - 6d - the ultimate creator/authority
*
something just dont feel right" even if it looks ordinary
*
on 3d level - it what it is
on 4d level - they dont know how to deal with office
on energy level - we need guardians help
there the battle is - it not the 3d issues
it a subconscious battle now
in which the surface 3d is but a symbol
- guardians
*
conscious authority is what we agree to
it the rules when we go to stores etc.
but if there subconscious authority - they want more and we cant say no
inner authority also cause of energy imbalance
if energy cant say no to something it not want be part of - it is not independent to free flow
*
guardians training us to deal with something bigger
so far we gaining ground but still behind
good work guardians
if we can neutralize the inner authority
they will naturally take step back
it be sign that this works
and there hope for future/past
something about this...just dont feel right
something we yet know ?
so we to do only essential
we to trust our future/feeling
3-15-21
we only need to ask
"what compassion want us to do ?"
- teresa
Marco Milanese
the name of the rep/he has compassion
but he not in charge
*
seeking again permanent easement
the tone has changed from friendly to stern
from john to ... mr chu
attaching multi page documents for us to sign, including permanent easement
- but we never even have any agreement
verbal or writing
you get the point
they showing their inner authority
*
we have already offered them, in so many words, to remove all the trees for free
- that would satisfy the real purpose
but they didnt respond to that
they want a permanent unconditional easement
even if all trees removed
they still want make permanent claim
for marginal price
make us wonder what their real intent is ?
*
we need time to figure it out
let the guardians dig this one up
3-19
i wouldn't sign anything until understand situation
- advisor
*
either way
we not to ask any seniors to sign anything needing notary until this world wide situation is cleared to do so
*
If we venture too far we come to a deadlock,... and whatever we do merely serves to complicate thing further ... But if, realizing the situation, we compose ourselves and decide not to continue, everything will right itself in time.
- i ching
*
they may pretend they know nothing of this website, but who among them is not aware of this website ?
and how many of his outstanding colleagues and supervisors
are behind him to go beyond the need ?
maybe the future already has the moment we realize it
3-21
*
we believe we will work it out
we are neighbors and all have same common bond - compassion
maybe another time when we have funding and know who has our back
we can do more
*
so this is not that person ?
-
no
and that person is your friend
he would never do anything to you
this just airport employee
the town is watching
you need not fear them
they go by rules
and people behind wont let them abuse the process
you also have friends in high places
they all watching this
so he also aware of you
- advisor
that a relief
3-20
*
to marco :
visualize a happy ending
we shaking hands smiling
win win
that the image we saw at riverside snoqualmie today
we just dont know how long
or maybe ...
it you working for us
that also happy ending
:)
*
johnson you should approach
you two can help eachother
this a time people need you
as a bridge to asian culture
asians too easy picked on
they just look other way
- advisor
to avoid global conflict
they need think zhu ren zhang when think of asia and not some dictators 20th century
no matter how sexy they are
- john
*
as for friends warm support
we are self sufficient and rarely ask for help
we just want know the support is there if in need ; we keep burden to minimal
just a place to receive mail etc.and answer few questions to make sure we updated on the rules
we can write our own memos
cover costs and make own persuasions
in return we pay for your time, promote your business and work together to create scripts
*
we rolled i ching
3 straight times same hexagram
- possession of the great
it the spirit speaking
it sign we cant back out
photo from mic of cedar mesa
-
where are you ?!
cedar mesa ?! ...
- john
yes sir
the battle station
- mic
outstanding
wish i be there
- chewey
3-20 6:30 pm
can the airport expansion be challenged ?
e.g. the new runway
if sothis be no better time
if we to hire a legal firm
and gather the support
we may begin research into it
either way
we hiring a firm to continue the negotiation
*
johnson name surfaces
but whether he has interest we dont know
we give him first chance
he has compassion
we cant really approach him
but if he makes a gesture our way
we can meet with help of a middle
another tale writing points to -
there a subconscious battle
but the symbol on the 3d/conscious is this
like they relying on us holding ground
if we let off on the resisting spirit
they will also lose it
*
they cant move our inner
the dharmakaya
maybe that what the other realm needs from us here ?
at first we were annoyed, wanting to sign and clear it out
but now we dont mind as long we have friends' support
to watch back outer
*
we looking for a legal firm to take over negotiation
and receive any future correspondence
in mean time
we work through the website
to dig into this
- john j chu
3-21-21
(2)
the return of the guardians
the legendary kung fu novel
pg - 13
if america is the soul of the world
this the battle for the soul of america
- general bd smith
if we cant stop it on the inner here now
no one else will
- buddha butt lady
june 2020
Neighbors of Sea-Tac Airport feel powerless over airport's sweeping expansion plans
- westside seattle magazine article
at first they came and then they keep taking
moving the new runway to outstanding everett - is the image we visualize
we first block their inner expansion
seatac/kent to south/east
burien/tukwila to north/west
deal with small before it big
we still watching this - undecided
it depends on their attitude and whether there is support
for now just writing what comes
maybe task is just write the insight
*
we dont have clear view yet
so cannot make any decisions
and wont sign anything until we do
but we have no real issues with giving them easement or the amount they offer
there something else to this we yet understand and need to wait for it to ripe
so we ask airport for forgiveness
and little patience
they now know why waiting on this
*
"there a fire mounting"
but these days people are more self-obssessed
to no fault of their own
"there too much they dealing with"
- bison
but if there no interest to support
we call around
- we'll give up this fight
3-24
the insight arrived
and so the airport battle is over
we to neutralize the easement ego
- that an inner battle
that good news for marco
we apologize - all of us including guardians
for giving him a hard time this past weeks
he is professional and has compassion
should be promoted
we bow with honor and respect
3-20-21
*
"yea, what do they really want"
- was what phil had to say of airport
3-20-21
*
we work out terms to both satisfaction
you get/we sign permanent easement
we get to build over it under certain height all hopis can walk under
*
we only need write what comes
we leave decision to them
*
i just want to know if there interest
like we back at pvf
there something we to do ?
- john
we to team up
- he nods
clapping two hands together
we be very formidable
- john
they shake hands
4-1-21 7 am
nayas
-
*
there no need to meet now
but it was good we had an understanding
4-5
they give us till wed to respond
so we'll wait few days to research and review the paperwork
again, he is not in charge
- we thank marco for working with us
4-5
*
from future to airport
what does your future say to you ?
what does your past say ?
4-6
that if they different
is your future trying to speak to you ?
*
this be our e-mail to marco :
(send it later today or thurs am)
"
Hey Marco
The documents are well drafted. Our compliments
we have narrowed it to two issues - they are very reasonable :
1) if in the future all the trees are removed from site - say we pave it over - then the easement would cease ?
if you have reason it not, can you please provide the legal basis - e.g. statutory language and/or case precedent in support
2) does the easement prevent us from building over the lot - say if we to pave over and/or build a garage under the height requirement
and what other restrictions should we need to know ?
please take your time to respond"
4-7
we will post response from them
we have come to have confidence and trust in marco
*
marco is delaying his response until after 4-19 - he says he has another project
we thank him for the kindness in giving us space to focus in on our task
we bow with honor and respect
4-9
legendary kung fu novel
pg - 13
seven kivas
the scouts brough the message
what all can already observe
4500 trumpis and 3000 switpis
surrounds the invaders
(like tukwila and burien)
"we only need to hold our ground"
- crazy horse
script
dark world
"chu only has to sign the easement
... and it be over here
- oracle
we must encourage him to not sign it
- guardians
*
chewpiland airport exists chewpiland
a parallel world to seatac 21st century
this realm/chewpiland
they just go and trim the trees
no one need sign anything
a hand shake is agreement/permission
seatac 21st century
they sent him five pages of agreement to sign
after he told them they can pick the berries on his driveway
*
it like there is fire
but no one want to fight it
but we to do what we can
we just here to help
those who can see us are fortunate
it like two different spheres
- bison shaman
*
- didnt want drag others in to this
co-own with family
otherwise,
could have hunted down more of the adventitious
but this is enough
*
writer task only to write what comes
he be rewarded own way
we no need the show
no need to sign to the obligation
we know nothing of the industry
we appreciate friends gesture to help
and like to keep option open in future
3-27-21
*
if phil takes over bill on the inner
there be a revolution
-chuy
so that phil needs to rise
-phil
the 1980's mischievous hippie
*
we not asking anyone to join
only if their future tells them
"it the intent which has value"
we have help others/self neutralized something which needs balance
*
what would compassion do ?
for now
we stay
they need us here
- guardians
chu office negotiate another peace truce
4-9
*
a self deprecating attorney in america is 180 of stereotype
we like to coach others
here at home and globally
it the weak circle
how fake is the humility is how fake is the lawyer - same act
we bow with honor and respect
*
to stand against giant bullying = neutralizing their inner authority
- many go law school for that reason
*
legendary kung fu novel
pg - 13
what happens in another world
what happens this world
dark world seven kivas
"we bring words of good news from scouts
- a temporary truce
the freemonts have opened the gate to allow northern helpers through
and they will stay neutral and not help the mayans in the siege against their southeast neighbor "
-anasazi chief
4-9
meeting with phil/kurt gave further confidence the project may have future
the circle here - jessica - be the ideal production partners
script
mr week chee
attorney at law
he is a chef at nays cafe
but an attorney from mexico
he passed the bar and is now licensed lawyer
looking for job and starting own office from the cafe
meets clients during slower hours
sometime cook same time
jessica/page turn into parallelgal/secretary
right now only do parking tickets
he takes 1/3 contingent
client keep 2/3 what they save
the restaurants packs up with clients/customers
(photo here)
we to post their response here
the history may be watching
*
can we find a common middle ?
vs.
permanent unconditional easement for minimal value or they bully you over with their resource
they should try to see from our angle ...
a voice need have for people who lack it
no one wants see us lose this
this not a private corporation
they need to see from both sides
*
you calling their bluff ...
- phil
maybe, but do they really want us out of their way ?
-
if momentum builds
how far can this go ?
- phil
airport is not our real objective
there may be something bigger
-
*
if they insist on it we will sign
they may have own reason why it must be signed now
but what momentum it may cut off
what opportunities allowed to slip away ?
but if they join us
they become part of history/show
this needs both sides participation to work
we are just a messenger
4-20
airport authority has inner/outer
even if this a dream
it the intent which has lasting benefit
otherwise, we always be subjecting to it inner from dream to dream
- if we team up and push them back - it may have influences in other dreams
- the opportunity present itself easy way
need a team - one can only do so much
- people just enjoying watching but in another dream they may be in different position
- you get point - at first they came in dream and we look the other way ...
it not the people we fighting - they just subjects to the mindset/system - it the inner pattern no one has control of
4-11
we would need a circle and
then we have leverage to neutralize them in air (mental world) ground (outer world) ocean (energy world)
phil first of the volunteers
*
recently saw bike shaman at bison cafe - he looks like our outstanding governor
we thank them for the support
give us confidence that the process is being watched
*
dont get suck into inner loop -inner past authority
there is no inner past authority other than now -
there only present moment memory
natural power of justice and mercy vs.
fake inner power usurped
covering up the real power
4-13
"send them compassion"
- mic
whenever see outstanding officers and/or people of authority etc. wherever
- as inner send them compassion
"they appreciate it"
vs.
over fear/respect (it a loop)
- there no human link
"i am the coyote man"
-
i am the china man
- china man
coyotes are tricksters
- coyote man
china man is just a name
- china man
who came up with that name coyote man ?
-
probably same dude who came up with china man
-
we all laugh
airport and/or compassion
airport have a decision to make
- to fight or to join us
they may have internal battle as well ?
we send them compassion
we like airport to join us
we can use all the help
but they may have to humble their ego
to be lowered to a loser like us
*
we havent yet heard from airport
if they give us a clear response
citing rules and clarifying restrictions
then we will agree
and if they do want join
we have many ideas to pass on
- help change the perception of seatac
as for the easement conversation
let talk about it in person when we meet
- we intent to give them easement of what they need
that would be win win
and a new role model for next century
4-22
we hoping somehow they also part of the circle so we can all team up
*
there also chance that they decide to take the ambush path ... ?
"no ... (they not like that)"
- mr chee
*
blessing can be cast from future
into past
from future :
marco is professional wise compassion
he should be elevated
4-24
*
we'll wait on hiring firm etc.
if they answer/explain our questions and is reasonable - then we will sign it
we hoping our focus can stay with the writing and not be diverted
*
we often last to know
is there something about this that future and everyone already know but we yet to ?
*
"yea ... what do they really want ?"
- phil
these wise words having more meaning
now more people with us more we know
the future guardians dont want distractions of such kind at this time
- that their message
*
more and more we begin to ask what is it they really want ?
if it is just that simple/random
then we sign and take minimum
the motive - that not a fact which can be changed now - so we just waiting
but we will know
we like to make peace with johnson
it willl have symbolic meaning across time
without it we would miss a chance
4-19
we send johnson compassion
maybe next week we to meet formally
mr chee and i already agree
this weekend talk to mrs chee to arrange
*
the idea of meeting johnson formally is awkward - they all be watching
yet we have talked few times this week
so if we meet that way
we keep talk same way ?
-
yea
- mr chee
4-21
*
he is most loyal/ethical to his people
and you not want be the other side
we need not be business partners but we can team up/work together
either way johnson and us should team up
our circles need us whichever world we in
the synergy multiplies our effectiveness as protectors
*
memory in a vision need not be sequential
the difference is that in a non sequential
- there creative ways of using them to create waves to help other worlds
e.g.
problem - solution is the sequential
but if all present moment
the solution can also come before the issue in our memory
solve the solution solve the problem
- that the reverse
e.g.
johnson and chu make peace ceremony the solution
it can appear first as memory to the conflict 94
so the less big deal we make of the alliance
the less problem is the memory
you get the point
e.g. #2
we then create this legal education seminar (CLE) for the show and/or in real for anyone to attend
the civility of lawyering
we sit at two ends of the panel of speakers
keep complimenting eachother
but never formally shake hands or talk
we just keep playing it - keeping it going
you get the point
the solution is solved - there no need to have the peace accord as antidote
*
the future sends blessing the moment the understanding / agreement is reached
the people there same people from future
this photo is good enough for both of us
and that all it matters
just another day at nayas
another solution solved ...
we thank those there
4-24-21
:)
legendary kung fu novel
pg - 13
dark world
you focus on the wizard
leave the port encroachment to us ...
- green army general
4-28
we not want impose burden on anyone
but if they sincere
we can use all the help
Question 1) If in the future all the trees are removed from site - say we pave it over - then the easement would cease? if you have reason it not, can you please provide the legal basis - e.g. statutory language and/or case precedent in support?
"The easement is permanent and would not cease if all trees are removed from the site. Even without any trees, the Port still has an interest in keeping the airspace above your property free of any obstructions that could interfere with the safe operation of aircraft, as required by FAA regulations and other applicable laws.
Under RCW 14.12.010(1), an “airport hazard” means “any structure or tree or use of land which obstructs the airspace required for the flight of aircraft…” For example, construction of a cellular tower that protruded into a flight surface would pose a safety hazard and would be prohibited by the easement (as well as federal regulations). Any airport hazard is considered to be a “public nuisance,” and the Port is therefore authorized to obtain these types of easements so that existing obstructions are removed and future obstructions prevented (tree or otherwise). RCW 14.12.020.
-marco 4-30
he did/didnt give an answer ?
just same evasive response as past
and/or he is speaking another language ?
he knows that it a non-answer
marco a wise and mature person
and he knows that we also know that ?
"you calling their bluff"
the non answer may also be a polite response of acknowledgement ?
let write slowly into this ...
what is it he really want to say ?
this not really about the easement ?
5-1
airport in dream an inner movement
computer generated illusions/reality
real and/or not real, the point is
we can change its inner chief
because in vision 21st century is no more
as inner, taking over the airport authority
that be the ground floor solution
- guardian chief
*
1850 office guardians to gather as circle
only those who sincere want to help
they have their leverage
and now we may have ours
inner and/or outer ?
if they don't have the legal basis, they should just negotiate this in fair and honorable way
but this not really about the easement ...?
it not about their attitude either
it not even about us or them ?
on our side
we can only say we trust our future
and future tells us to write what comes and no do anything until it gives passion
*
"Only that which has been honestly acquired through merit remains a permanent possession. It can happen that such a possession may be contested, but since it is really one's own, one cannot be robbed of it. Whatever a man possesses through the strength of his own nature cannot be lost.
i ching
5-1
if he is , we are honored and will sign it
- out of respect for him
5-1
if so ... the entire town would know by now ?
then we are honored to sign it
just another day at nayas
another solution solved ...
5-2
we need to humble and ask for his advise and/or guidance/help
this is a special person
we should first apologize
let figure out together how we best do this
- john chu
:)
5-3
ok, let say it is
what does his future want
what does our future want
that is the same ?
*
is there something more to both sides benefit , that there potential to continue this
but in a friendly fun way
the future both sides pulling ?
*
we still need respond to marco
we to agree but reserve option for time being
Dear Marco
we are pleased to let you know we have agreed, in general terms, to the easement.
It has been my way to let it sit a little time before finalizing the decision. We may have a few follow up questions. As a retired attorney, old habits remain.
so we will reserve our response and get back to you this time next week.
5-5
just another day at nayas
another solution solved ...
shift of perception alters the paradigm
it not about airport and seatac residence
it an old friendship maybe here to help us
future need us to wait until we know
then it fine to sign
he is here and/or can be our ally
we have met at cafe ?
any friend of mic is our friend
deja vu
the be a nice completion
coming together of old friends
*
mr chee was recently the recipient of the award for best parking ticket lawyer of the year in washington state
top parking ticket lawyers gather to honor the special occasion
including the legend of all parking ticket lawyers ... mr bud hart
the first recipient of the award
of course
the recent hike in parking ticket fees means the parking ticket lawyers fees also rise
it a good time to be parking ticket lawyers
*
jessica recently graduated from paralegal school majoring in parking tickets
she want to attend night school to get her degree and become a parking ticket lawyer
Very good response from Marco :
"John – that’s great to hear and I appreciate how thoughtful you have been throughout this process.
5-5
we enjoyed working with him
*
we can agree to the easement language subject to our time frame
as for the extra tree cutting agreement - it did not surface until recent
we like to keep it to the essential
we hope he can extend us that courtesy
*
this like a online CLE for those learning
draft of letter to marco (we send it thursday am/pm) :
"we bring good news on the easement.
there are two proposed agreements and they need be treated separately
1.easement
we are willing to bypass further questions on the easement (even if they can be answered, it would drag us into the summer). in exchange, we simply ask where notary public is needed, you allow the parties to be fully vaccinated - about mid june
if this is acceptable, please forward the final draft. we reserve right to have it reviewed.
alternatively
if power of attorney is acceptable, we may be able to get it signed sooner
5-10
we will share proceed with two tenants after receiving it
as inner
there is inner airport /there is outer airport
the outer is not here/the inner is here
*
as outer, we now have a passion for future to approve signing the easement
- we did it as respect to our old friend
in honor of his reaching out to us
we are humbled and like to learn
we bow with honor and respect
*
as inner - between us and airport expansion - nothing has changed
as inner, they not to expand into others land
- guardians
*
"if we are able to return early 90's
we not likely to battle again
we only ask you give that young attorney some guidance - he could use it"
-
mr chee nods
*
we didnt know this linked to our old friend network
it the reason future wouldn't let us sign until understood
these are people here to help us
and we are thankful
we didnt know who they were and so apologize if we reacted too cautiously
- it wasn't anything personal
we will work out the terms
5-9
*
future to present :
make sure marco win and look good
but keep it simple
*
again, outstanding marco is our friend
he just delivering the documents
airport 's gentle PR person - very good
it not matter
easement and/or no easement
that why he is successful
he gets it done
it the result
we will sign
he came to network with us
we want to work with the master
the office bows with honor and respect
john chu
5-12
Dear Marco :
the easement :
we agree to the terms
but give us until mid june to gather the signatures
if above terms are agreeable
please forward the documents
we reserve the right to review the final draft
it has been a honor to work with you
please take care
john chu
5-13
we about a week or two away from signing the first agreement
- there is no agreement until signed
any subtle pressure to get us to sign earlier wont be helpful
we ask for mid june - there only one agreement (both agreements)
- they not really giving us anything for this nor answered our question
- they should be thankful we doing this for marco
*
we dont know who they are
just that "there only few here"
so they likely part of circle ?
if so, we sign - they our friends
if not, we like to know who they are
- he is (linked to) someone at nayas ?
because if not, we need to know
*
we like to hear from readers/from future what they think ?
*
our inner power with airport is equalizing
and we have yet to hire a firm
*
so if there a reason we should not sign
someone will need to speak up
5-18-21
what would bud want us to do ?
*
if johnson and i team up
he a time traveler able to see into future
we happy to sign the easement
we just want make sure the future is in agreement
*
if they here just to network
then that outstanding
we happy to sign
we like to work together
maybe purpose this is they here to get us to use this as tool to team up ...
because future needs us
and/or certain inner expansion need be stopped
etc
then those who can see future should tell us what need done here
*
as practical matter
we to let them trims the trees no matter the easement
we already offered them what they can get and we already willing accept less than what we can receive
they should be thankful we gifting it and allow us all the reasonable time we need to be comfortable with signing it
5-19
on airport
the elder circle discusses what to do ...
it the same inner pattern
no matter the outer dream
- mr chee
if you seen future and
if give me a reason and game plan
to join forces
this be best time
we can consider change of plans
nothing is final until signature
-
*
it was a fools hope from beginning
but ...
if we can turn it ... then history has new ally from future
the momentum is what is important
5-21
snoqualmie pass
5-19-21
"we dont have to sign"
- future
they cant answer our question
*
my present self says to sign
but i dont know of my future self
if it different will let you know
- phil
my present self also says to sign
but my future self not clear
-john
*
what if there really a future
trying to reach back to get us listen
can we hear them ?
they would need send us a sign this weekend
- that we not to sign until enter this sphere
-
so he had to keep up the show for five months
now we good to sign
:)
*
future
they may send a song
*
we write what comes
ask all questions before signing
5-21
airport is powerful
-phil
but they not suppose to be our opponent
but our ally
- john
we not looking to fight them
but to get them join us
maybe that what future trying to do to get us to keep working with marco
keep the show going then something will just click
like with mr chee and circle
but once signed
the possibility is over
write what comes
bible interpretation :
if eminent domaine gives them one feet but they seek two - then they seek more than entitled
if it given/offered to you
vs. seeking things beyond entitlement
5-22
and they pressure next door neighbor at a time they least likely to resist
three pigs in straw hut
three pigs in rock hut
deeper the compassion
deeper the root
"deep roots are not reached by the frost"
- jr tolkien
- reverse i ching
is that what future saying ?
we need to build on this momentum to stop something on the inner - an inner authority not american but taking over
it the same force taking over other nations from within - it not them
but only in american west do we have the power to match it ?
-
people attention shift away from the essential/what is really taking place beneath
writer doing admirable job of keeping the momentum/show going with his bs skills
by this time, he has delivered the message
and we thank him
if we can slow/stop that inner force in america, it will cease in other nations as well
we dont know,
we will keep writing
the future is talking
5-22
the hidden option to either sign or not sign easement is for future to return to past and avert it from there
- guardians
5-29
send the energy into the no fear rock
the being behind airport
future knows
if you can answer our question
the debate ends and we gladly sign
we ok with signing it but it may influence our relationship ?
we don't know
we to stay polite/professional
*
"if they cant explain it
they shouldn't seek it"
-
*
maybe airport has message from future
and/or people using airport as point to send message to us ?
but there must be first 1) good relationship and 2) you cant take from him what he not want give
*
if this chewpiland
he doesnt want to sign anything for trimming trees
just trim the trees
there no easements in chewpiland
no one recording it
take on the burden to save the world
and it will wipe clear all your shallow burdens
*
compassion vs. standrad protocol
if ones to go, which would it be ?
*
we working on power of attorney
and then to sign it
they give us end of june
thank you
let get this done
:)
5-27
if airport retreats
it be a tie
we already ready to sign
if airport advances
they win
6-1
"Even if by chance a leather belt is bestowed on one,
By the end of a morning
It will have been snatched away three times."
- i ching
Here we have someone who has carried a conflict to the bitter end and has triumphed. He is granted a decoration, but his happiness does not last. He is attacked again and again, and the result is conflict without end.
- commentary
let the outstanding airport staff decide
they all reading ?
and then we can have an alliance based on respect and trust
6-1
measuring my strength
comparing it to 1994
we can time travel back to help that day
marco is mr chee /johnson ?
the alliance is a tool for future time travelers to benefit
the realization of it may be the resolution
maybe we simply have a talk
find a resolution mutually beneficial
and this matter be done
*
"so you marco of airport?
-
yea
-
i sign if you want it signed
but it not necessary ?
-
no
- mr chee
if so
we will work it out
6-2-21
*
1995 last we talked
johnson offered ... cup of coffee
the ideal conclusion is not for easement or not
but for us to meet and laugh over a cup of coffee
we no need talk about that past
just two lawyers from seattle , for old times sake
6-6
mr cheee does look like johnson but whether he is marco we not sure - but there no reason for him to make it up
if so we should just be able to deal with directly at nayas and bypass the e-mail formalities
i will talk to him later this week
6-8
we have agreement with mr chee if marco needs docs signed sooner than allowed time - he will just ask us in person
we want to allowed writing to come and get comfortable first with the easement signing
we ready to sign and give mr chee what he needs
but if it can be avoided
we would like to see the options
how can we help you ?
how can we help one another ?
6-4
we will retreat voluntarily
next week we will begin prepare the power of attorney
*
"In retreating the superior man is intent on taking his departure willingly and in all friendliness. He easily adjusts his mind to retreat, because in retreating he does not have to do violence to his convictions."
- i ching
- our stance against airport expansion stands
*
it is because our friendship with mr chee
he came to us in spirit of humility
he is sincere even if not able to say in words
- we are appreciative
june 5 2pm
it my fault for dragging this so long
but now i know it you
this way for us to re-connect
i will get it signed
marco can then done his task
- john chu
ok
- mr chee smiles
bud , mrs chee and daughter naya smile
we can close an old chapter
:)
*
show strength
lose every battle
that how it is to be friends
power comes by asking the right questions
likely mr chee is johnson
but he is not marco ?
6-9
"i dont think (mr chee) is marco
you should just get it signed "
- la lady
i didnt think so either
*
marco a nice person
looking younger
*
we waiting on approving the power of attorney form and tenants signatures later his week - then we will sign/mail the access agreement first - then easement later
6-14
*
marco is/was protected by us
6-15
we like to meet marco and say hi
i buy him coffee
:)
dream this am
tony in same train
cheerfully he exits the station
*
when meditate on marco
he is compassion
when dealing with airport
the quality not as elevated
so there room to improve
for both sides
john chu bows with honor and respect
6-16
*
yet to hear from marco on access agreement tenants signed
so signed and mail out our copy this am
the access agreement effectively confirms the easement
but the other 3 owners yet to sign
so until easement is signed
there no easement
6-22
this is not fair
- guardians
7-15
cant solve something with same level of something
marco is part of the circle
with bud and mr chee
bud is the japan buddha at gompa ?
the one clown buddha said "if you want to know buddhism; he the one to talk to"
they all part of the circle
what do they really want ?
"we relate to people out of fear or out of love"
- gift show
"he surrendered to the spirit
not the white man"
- bison shaman
"Making a boast of power leads to entanglements, just as a goat entangles its horns when it butts against a hedge. Whereas an inferior man revels in power when he comes into possession of it, the superior man never makes this mistake. He is conscious at all times of the danger of pushing ahead regardless of circumstances, and therefore renounces in good time the empty display of force."
- i ching
john chu is the inferior
making boast of his power
marco never makes this mistake
that why he won this round
he never pushed
yet we caved ...
airport easement we can agree in general
if $3000 their honest top offer
we'll agree to the terms
again
we apologize to marco for using up his time
we also like to use this as chance to make peace with johnson
which maybe we already have
just here to help
the trains keep moving
3-26
*
we to let guardians first speak
they have clear message for people of certain place/time
now they have spoken
writer task done
he will be rewarded in own way
the rest is up to you
PVF
:)
Business Notes
if there future which the show prevailed
it be sending us message now
guardians stay to protect
whether or not easement is signed
- the office negotiates another truce
just as they on track of the red october
"sir, the headquarter called
we must return for submarine routine maintenance and to change carpet
-
cant they wait ?
- captain
no, it standard protocol
-
.jpg)
guardians supplement
7-21
future/present to past/february :
let them trim trees
don't sign easement
bring the file to us
8-14-21
he holding on to power of attorney form
we not going to pressure him
until he is willing
until then
the airport can try to pressure me
the guardians don't think it fair
7-18
we like to ask them to further clarify the legal basis of the permanent easement
they didnt answer our question ?
now that tree trimming agreement is signed by writer - we have shown our good faith
there no more reason to be hurry to sign anything
but we first wait for them to write us
then we follow the guardians
*
we like to make hopi peace
win win
*
we are willing to sign ; we will wait past this week to ask for the form - see what more may come out of this conversation
7-19
*
either way
we look forward to meet marco
the one who was there at beginning
he has become a friend
"we see a happy ending"
:)
*
we will talk to bud little more
we just want make sure he ok with it - for us to write what comes and use humor to show our view
- we want keep a good relationship
so far he seems to encourage us to stand up to airport
maybe his idea is to leave it as it is until we return ?
7-21
you on our side
you always been around me through our time
-
yes
in one way or another
- bud
*
maybe the gift of this teamwork is not so much for ourselves
but marco and john have given the future a tool to deal with
8-1-21
:)
to deal with it now
or they be back
"In a time of flowering culture, an occasional convulsion is bound to occur, uncovering a hidden evil within society and at first causing a great sensation. But since the situation is favorable on the whole, such evils can easily be glossed over and concealed from the public. Then everything is forgotten and peace apparently reigns complacently once more. However, to the thoughtful man, such occurrences are grave omens that he does not neglect. This is the only way of averting evil consequences."
- i ching
*
"this place of the mind so nothing is random "
*
they already have their tree trimming agreement
this is not random
what they really want ?
there is no legal basis to the permanent easement , only conditional one - so this easement is not fair
and why they need an easement which exceeds what statute gives them ?
the timing of it and the value is also not fair
if it going to be permanent - that not a fair value just because people they hire say so
- guardians
just start chanting that to the airport people - "this is not fair"
what do they really want ?
7-18
*
on airport
you want me to sign it
just say so
- john
half half
-
no need to sign but to keep the show going ?
-
yes
- bud
7-19
whether or not he part of it - he seems to know what going on
*
likely they not want get further involved and that's fine
we had to at least ask
*
airport
maybe they just using us ?
and we had enough of that
if friendship is true - that only type we seek
they no need keep play chess games
they will need choose
we should step back and observe
7-30
either way
he has become our friend
we his protector of longevity
marco is a good and kind person
we dont care
if they need us to sign we will sign
marco has his job to do
but if there chance to preserve the momentum - to come back and see how we can teamwork to counter other worldly forces
"there is a gathering of people"
we should give it a chance ?
- 7-22
marco just doing his job
if they not have legal basis
his job should not/can not dependent on it
his is just convey bosses' directive
it may depend on his bosses ?
the commissioners
seek their support the guardians should if they want this to continue
writer just messenger
he not to fight this on own
- guardians
7-25
*
"John, checking back on the status of the easement. How is it going with the power of attorney process? Marco"
7-26
"will get to work on it"
-
7-28
*
they dont likely have have legal basis to claim permanency and they know that
but they also wont back off
and it not worth to make a fight over
we do what we reasonably can to keep gathering going so there no regret
- is it even worth the effort ?
so unless guardians can make their influence now
this will come to end ...
we are just a messenger
7-28
write what comes ...
what if, just what if
future needs this gathering to avert something
as personal - we want get it done and make easy on marco
as messenger of guardians -
they only allowed us to sign the access agreement
why guardians also persistent about this ?
it a bit confusing for us as well
but since they yet to answer our question
we have a reason to wait
we ask for guidance
7-28
dont step out of our capacity
and to stay humble to the words given
7-29
it may depend on his bosses ?
the commissioners
seek their support the guardians should if they want this to continue
*
they got the guardians involved now
like they taking over
"if they want marco to keep pushing without a legal basis
we like to ask for their reason"
- guardians
8-15
on airport
by bypassing middle person and going directly to the outstanding commissioners
they can then answer what we really want to know
what do they really want ?
we dont care about the easement debate
no one does
we just have to draw the attention and give it enough time to persuade the audience this not ordinary/random
8-23
they know what we trying to do - gathering
and they know they havent answered our question
*
the guardians momentum is matching their inner expansion
-
8-24
what be win win is for seatac neighbors
temporary truce - no one going on the offensive - let see what words come from future
we been so far playing defense
airball defense
we wont let writer to keep be on the defensive
- guardians
still water ...
both sides
8-26
Hi Marco
I am glad we have the access agreement signed so you can proceed with the tree removing duties.
As for the easement, I want to make sure everyone is comfortable with the details of the language.
There remains a question and I am hoping you can help us clarify :
On the permanency of the easement, If all the trees are removed, is there a legal basis the airport has to make such claim ? Logic would be that the easement would expire and should not be permanent.
But you are saying that the airport does have such right ? If so, are you able to give us more details of the legal basis - such as a specific statute and/or case laws that would support airport's claim.
I know we've gone a few rounds into this and apologize if it sounds redundant.
Thanks for your understanding.
john
7-28
this is a very reasonable question any citizens should be entitled to ask
*
Marco's response :
"John --
Thanks for your patience regarding the Port’s responses to the questions you and your fellow property owners posed about the permanent easement.
Regarding the permanent easement, one of the primary purposes of the Flight Corridor Safety Program is to prevent future hazards (as described in the Port Commission Resolution provided with your paperwork), which also includes obstructions that are not trees. Even without any trees, the Port still has an interest in keeping the airspace above your property free of any obstructions that could interfere with the safe operation of aircraft, as required by FAA regulations and other applicable laws. Under RCW 14.12.010(1), an “airport hazard” means “any structure or tree or use of land which obstructs the airspace required for the flight of aircraft…” For example, construction of a cellular tower that protruded into a flight surface would pose a safety hazard and would be prohibited by the easement (as well as federal regulations). Any airport hazard is considered to be a “public nuisance,” and the Port is therefore authorized to obtain these types of easements so that existing obstructions are removed and future obstructions prevented (tree or otherwise). RCW 14.12.020.
I hope that helps explain. Please let me know if you have any further questions."
8-10
they didnt answer the permanency question ?
*
they may think their answer is clever but it not persuading anyone
*
it a simple/straightforward statute
the statute never mentions permanent, just what is reasonable and "none shall impose any requirement or restriction which is not reasonably necessary"
"Reasonableness : All airport zoning regulations adopted under this chapter shall be reasonable and none shall impose any requirement or restriction which is not reasonably necessary to effectuate the purposes of this chapter"
RCW 14 .12.090
furthermore, airport has yet to show any case law or other statute which would entitle them to a permanent claim
maybe because there isn't one ?
will work on this next week
8-13
"keep stretching it ..."
- bud's advise on airport
8-28
in virtual reality games
the inner airport is a program which if its inner authority seen as outer - if we get pulled by an inner movement -
a pillar is created and then from there ...
they ask for response, in a nice way - 8-26
we to follow guardians advise and ask again
- we dont need to win
but they need let us through
- keep it cordial and be competent
"Marco
always good to hear from you.
The question posed to me was “if the trees are removed, it means the statute would no longer apply. right ?”
as their trusted advisor on this, we must make good faith to clarify whether there is in fact a legal basis to justify a permanent easement. they are entitled to know.
so far, we can not conclusively state that there is and therefore cannot yet advise/answer this question. we would need more of your input.
(1)
if the statute does give airport claim to a permanent easement, there should be case precedents in support ?
(2)
can you please identify/offer this information. It would help me answer the questions and move forward.
again, we reserve right to make final review"
8-30
*
again, our apologies to marco
we not wanting to be difficult
he responded cordially and indicates that "a port counsel will be responding to our questions"
this will get more clear
9-2
.jpg)
"if they already going to remove the trees
then there no more ... (statutory claim) to an easement"
- kurt
if you not comfortable with all that e-mail
why dont you take a week off and slow down
you dont owe them such obligation
(to be so responsive - they the one taking too much)
you not working on a file for clients
- Phil
this a public entity
they should act in honest/good faith
if they dont have such authority, they should be forthright in answering the questions if asked
- guardians
it like someone on a tourist visa wanting permanent residency
- the big man
you a lawyer and so if you litigate against them, we dont mind
- la lady
it a great relief
writer no fear inner of these things
"cautious but not worry"
but he didnt want drag others in
otherwise we be able to advance into them
and not hoping they not advance, once runs out of reason , by abuse power
micro of macro
of course, we wont advance nor they us
we seattle / compassion
and world all watching
we watch the flow and see what comes
9-8
airport like a machine
in vision
a machine is created by a program
it also of one collective mind
people inside the machine makes the way
they want to be friends with chewpiland
there no going forward unless we have resolution to this
we ask for still water
- guardians
9-10
the port counsel gives same answer as marco
basically - they dont have case precedent and they want to interpret the statute their way etc.
- will post it next week
that fine and writer asked to keep it going
but he to not write for airport
they havent let us through
we will need to wait until they do
what do they really want ?
- guardians
but if reason not prevail, at what point do they shift - as inner - from reason into even thinking about using force ?
that the inner movement the guardians monitoring
Season 2
(A)
guardians objection is that it distracted our focus on the issue in a time most needed - early spring - it got away ...
if they were reading our writing
guardians seem persistent on proving something
so we will continue ...
maybe guardians trying to change the past ?
but need first to prove their intent
9-5-21
*
the tide is turning
"you should get tough on them"
- big man
the guardians want talk exorcism
how many guardians do we have here ?
let us know your opinion this week
viewers' opinion :
"you should (get tough on them)"
- big man
something they doing you yet see clear but many guardians already know
the guardians are ready
- viewer #1
if you see this as real world
then it a random easement of no issue
if you see this as a vision
there nothing random about this kind of inner taking
- viewer #2
never fear asking for help
ask the old man and page and staff at naya cafe
to create a circle to confront this inner encroachment
- viewer #3
9-15
"dont mess with the nagas ?"
-
what do they really want ?
-
who is really behind all this ?
these questions not for the port counsel to answer and are being asked by the nagas
"dont drag others in"
this really not about the easement debate
*
they can choose not to answer
this just unpublished page
- guardians
*
writer only needed to show there no case precedent to support their interpretation
then in human world (of three world)
he has reason to hold his ground
maybe this really a battle of underworld ?
we write what comes
9-13
guardians need get through to protect future
writer does not want to be rude
- they been polite
for now, writer will write what comes
and then take words off if unsure
we are much closer to rivaling them now than when it started
we are hopeful both sides can conclude this peacefully
- they already have what they need ?
and know why we need get through
so ... how may we help you ?
9-16
we all want what is best
no one wants a battle
not in the world of compassion
ok
airport by this time may be reading
and may listen to its own future
what does it tell us both and each ?
does it say ...
get him to sign ?
and/or
help them get through
we need this gathering ?
*
if it the first
that airport future tells us
"you should just sign it"
then we ourself need to reflect deeper
and maybe we should/will just then sign it
if the second
then that future is against its own past / present ?
something will give ...
- humble rinpoche
if can stay united and anchored, then future we keep self strengthen - not pulled by the higher megawatt power etc.
- guardians
"i'm checking in to see where you are with completing the Power of Attorney document.
-Marco Milanese
Community Engagement Manager
Port of Seattle
9-22
it still marco we need talk to
who is he ? ...we ask the commissioners
*
and how does writer respond ?
(you dont have to respond to that yet)
*
he pretends to have the authority but not
we yet to have clear view
*
'if this not random ... we not blocking the guardians"
nothing in vision is random
"you think this is some kind of a scam ? "
*
guardians to circle marco
let find out what really want
- future guardians
9-24
the tide is turning
![twin-heart-stone-weir-5[6].jpg](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a50212_2cef0d9bcc5b4054bd7ff46e836553b8~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_196,h_147,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/twin-heart-stone-weir-5%5B6%5D.jpg)
strategy room notes
- more more we agreeing with those who sees this not as random
there no going forward on other issues until we resolve this
we have reached the turning point
now let the future take over
- future guardians
the old man from asia
ivars/bud
you will have to deal with us in future
we dont want any more obstacles in present for writer
and the guardians will back down
what do you say ?
*
the future has taken them and/or no issue
and if the present not pulled
what remains is adventitious
*
if they real friend
they will show good faith
until they do
writer and writing to keep distance
this only way it resolved
or he will keep appearing elsewhere
this may be the real issue for guardians
*
what would compassion do ?
*
the i ching has kind/wise words for old friend-
"arrogance means that one knows how to press forward but not to draw back... knows something about winning but nothing about losing"
we had our share of losses and been humbled
so easy in saying "hey i am a loser" or "i am wrong" "it my fault" etc.
but if cant do that ...
"arrogant dragon will have cause to repent"
like how fonz cant say the word "wro..."
that the only thing he can learn from loser like us
and if he learns that, he is likeable person
there nothing we can do
but unless they back off
we ask our future to withdraw from the relationship - stay friendly cordial
our future will listen if it wants cooperation from past
- future reluctantly agrees
they are ancient friends ; yet this is a start over
but provided they be given chance to make up and writer can change the request later
*
they may not back off - their friends may laugh at them and they have the power so no reason
but it will give us reason to withdraw later
9-26 am
it not because of the easement
but who they are and why
the reason we yet to sign
"it been over 20 years
and they have shown good faith
you can forgive them
and he has forgiven you
they shown their sincerity
maybe this can conclude in a happy way for all
- la lady
i already have
even before we met this past year
and if he wants me to apologize for other reasons i can do that too
but maybe this verge of start over and they want be friends in future
they come to meet me
- john
*
we willing to sign
but they should just let us know in person
it should involve the real people
e.g. mr chee etc.
then it will have the happy conclusion
the hand shake and smile
we will leave the choice to them
- john chu
9-26 5pm
so far ...
- they dont have case precedents to support their statutory interpretation
- they have burden to prove the "permanent" is "reasonable and necessary"
we still researching / working on it
guardians rivaling their inner power
10-5
power comes by asking the right question and not withdraw from that meeting point ... they withdrew from
.
if cross line and cant answer , we advance into the matrix
future holds them
they cant advance after that
e.g.
is that a question or a statement ?
(B)
in vision/as inner
the ultimate dissolution dissolves the inner airport
- vision hunters
if this works, then there is great potential
12-1-21
John – Hoping we can wrap up the permanent easement agreement somewhat soon. Any more progress made recently on the power of attorney?
And just an FYI – the tree removal work on the property is expected now to occur on 10/21 (Thursday). Contractors had meant to begin today but there was some equipment still in the way of the trees slated for removal. That equipment has since been moved.
Take care.
Marco
10-13-21
Thanks Marco.
We also like to wrap it up so tenants can get their payments.
As their advisor, like a middle person, I need to give them a honest view on this. I am a retired lawyer so knows a little of how the statutes are interpreted.
So far, 1) There is no case precedent to support airport's statutory interpretation - per your counsel's response ; and 2) the port has the burden to prove that "permanent" is both "reasonable and necessary" as required by the statute.
We not saying the port has not a claim, but we like to hear your response to this.
Thanks again Marco.
John
10-14-21
*
this week/end
we will let guardians give input what we should do
if it their purpose to work together ? then we should find a way to benefit both sides
"we want to work together ..."
- mr chee
in future we believe many students be reading this - so we should do best to make seatac a role model
*
micro/macro
what would compassion do ?
a common citizen dont have our legal skill nor the social attention this is gathering
so we should do it for them and the future
if reason prevail, we should sign
the guardians will oblige
but if reason not prevail, at what point do they shift - as inner - from reason into even thinking about using force ?
that the inner movement the guardians monitoring
- we stop them/pin it down at inception , dont even think of it - then there no issues
it the inner direction - that cannot be the future culture of the role model of peaceful democracy
airport staff/guardians need be the first to stop it
- guardian chief
10-15-21
all mr chee has to do is , in person, ask us to sign
and we will ask jim to complete the power of attorney
that is all, then gathering is over and this complete
either way, we like to complete this
*
alternatively , if he wants to work together
then we should also talk in person
we at that point we can speak openly ?
we see him almost every am coffee
so it up to him to let us know the direction
10-11-21
"if one day airport here no more
why they need a permanent easement then ?"
- your name here
asking good questions
our viewers we thank for support
10-20
on airport
"they just trimmed /removed the trees
now maybe the statute wouldnt even apply anymore
-
"yea, i guess so"
- frank
but there no point to contest it
-- john
you should set a time frame
maybe like a month or so
if you cant persuade them
you should just sign it
- frank
yea
-
10-28
"the port has the burden to prove that "permanent" is both "reasonable and necessary" as required by the statute."
-
the classmates nods as they listen attentively
the year oct 1989
place u penn law
beginning first semester
- the legendary kung fu novel
From our view
the statute is not difficult to interpret : that airport given right to remove trees/hazards but it has be reasonable and necessary
RCW 14.12.090
Airport zoning requirements.
(1) Reasonableness. All airport zoning regulations adopted under this chapter shall be reasonable and none shall impose any requirement or restriction which is not reasonably necessary to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.
The airport's legal team response is similar to marco's explanation
that the statute entitles them to easement of "permanent".
There no mentioning of "permanent" in the statute, but without case precedent, they are entitled to their own interpretation.
The counsel confirms that there not a case precedent which specifically address it and the obvious that if statute is interpreted their way, then port then no need to proof need for permanent.
here it is :
"Hi John,
Marco forwarded your additional questions to me for a response from the Port.
(1) With respect to case precedent, I cited case law that references these statutes below and simply noted that there may not be an identical example. That is not at all unusual. As I imagine you are aware, state statutes do not require case law interpretation to be fully effective and enforceable. These statutes are clear on their face that the Port can acquire permanent property rights (including permanent easements) to prevent future airport hazards from occurring and ensure safe, unobstructed passage of aircraft above your property. RCW 14.12.020; RCW 14.08.030(3).
(2) With respect to the relative burdens, in an eminent domain action, the burden would actually be on the property owner to show that the Port has acted fraudulently or committed constructive fraud in determining the need for the easement. Here, the Port has explained and determined the need for a permanent easement over your property in Resolution No. 3771 (previously provided). As explained by our courts, once the local governmental body (here, the Port Commission) has determined that acquisition of a permanent easement is reasonably necessary for the Port’s project, that finding “will, by the courts, be deemed conclusive, in the absence of proof of actual fraud or such arbitrary and capricious conduct as would amount to constructive fraud.” City of Tacoma v. Welcker, 65 Wn.2d 677, 684, 399 P.2d 330 (1965); Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. v. Miller, 156 Wn.2d 403, 411, 128 P.3d 588 (2006). “The burden of proving either fraud or constructive fraud is on the objector [property owner].” In re Port of Seattle, 80 Wn.2d 392, 398, 495 P.2d 327 (1972).
I hope this is helpful in explaining the Port’s position."
10-25
port's legal counsel response to our questions.
11-1
what matter is whether there a future "point/beacon" which this leads to ?
if not
then we should apologize for wasting their time and get jim to complete the form to sign
if so
then we need to link to it
both sides ?
it that simple
the easement debate we not here to win
and against a lawyer of obvious quality and skill
just to keep it going until that future reveals itself
we to keep it entertaining and purposeful
*
airport will be here until it not here no more - that how they view "permanent"
but who be here longer ?
the seatac residents
*
on the micro level
this about a business in seatac
wanting permanent claim over residents of seatac
they may not be here forever
yet they want a permanent claim
that is how they interpret the statute
they should have no doubt of it
there not any case precedent to contradict it
*
there also none to support it
so neither side can enforce their will upon the other
neither has been persuasive to the other
this a real tug of war
- chewpi news analyst
10-31
our view : we dont dispute port has right to remove trees, but why it necessary to be "permanent" ?
few scenarios we may ask them to address
1) what happens in distant future if airport is here no more. does the easement stays in effect forever ?
2) what if there nothing on the land. can port still make a permanent claim on the potential they can build a cell tower in future ?
3) if someone backyard, planted a small tree which could in distant future become a hazard - does airport now have right to claim a permanent easement that would entitle them to enter/exit the property forever ?
4) and what if the property owner takes down the tree port identified to be hazard ? e.g. like ours
do they still have a permanent claim ?
*
we dont know
we ask marco for little extra time to allow these questions to sink in - this new to us
then if they still reasonable - we will forward the questions
11-1
(C)
guardians message on/to airport commissioners
if they cannot persuade the future guardians
e.g. like 2030 people all reading
then future gives no support ...
11-8
easy to enter outer not easy to exit inner
those already in will tell you
we give them every chance to withdraw
do they really want to enter more ?
- guardian
11-20
Marco confirms that the trees/hazards have been removed
this may create a new issue - whether the statute even applies at all ?
- we dont know
John – I also wanted to let you know that they all the trees identified as obstructions on your family’s property just south of the airfield are now down and removed. All trees were cut close to the ground and the team made the decision to not grind the stumps because of their proximity to the paved parking area. Grinding could have further damaged the pavement in the parking area. Please, when you have the opportunity, visit the property and confirm you are good with the work as conducted.
Marco
10-25
*
(1)
airport says once "port has determine need for permanent easement" they can have it ;
that property owners have no right to question the reasonableness and necessity of it
and
(2)
the only defense property owners have is "to show show that the Port has acted fraudulently"
"the burden would actually be on the property owner to show that the Port has acted fraudulently or committed constructive fraud in determining the need for the easement.
... once the local governmental body (here, the Port Commission) has determined that acquisition of a permanent easement is reasonably necessary for the Port’s project, that finding “will, by the courts, be deemed conclusive, in the absence of proof of actual fraud or such arbitrary and capricious conduct as would amount to constructive fraud.”
- Adrian Urquhart Winder
Foster Garvey LLC
*
Fraud is a deliberate act (or failure to act) with the intention of obtaining an unauthorized benefit, either for oneself or for the institution, by using deception or false suggestions or suppression of truth or other unethical means, which are believed and relied upon by others.
- online
*
we cant proof with persuasion airport /fraud the same they cant proof with persuasion necessity/reasonableness of permanent right
but if they believe they can
we same
there no ground for our interpretation/their interpretation - each side would say
what does each our future say ?
11-9
how can we help you ?
11-10
"i dont think they are being pernicious
but i dont think it a good idea to give it away on a permanent basis
- jim
they are nice people
but now the trees are trimmed
we are no different than any lot near by
- john
*
do they really believe they entitled to it permanently ?
let just deal with that issue first
"what does your gut tells you ?"
11-9
*
if future calls for our present to help
e.g. boycott
our present will follow that future
if they do, it be a collective message sent from e.g. 2030 gathering to those link to it
we would each be clear - it your 2030 speaking to us today
e.g. us today sending message to march to not sign
2030 they gather to send help to their past
e.g.
"the future would give airport no support"
you get the point
*
it still our preference to sign
but the future need give feeling
so maybe a middle ?
over a cup of coffee
we have guardians to thank
they stood ground for us
writer bows with honor and respect
*
on airport. we just write what comes
apologize if it ...
we show our strength but in friendliness
then it more easy to settle this
like guardians future just want us to know we can rival them
11-10
*
vision vs. reality, in vision there no airport
just a 80 mega watt power which seem real/we yet rival
difference is cause and effect
in vision, only if they higher mega power
if not - it just inner movement
you get point
11-13
"The situation is very favorable. People are being won not by coercion but by unaffected sincerity, so that they are attached to us in sincerity and truth."
"It is modest and true, therefore it moves other ... to confidence. ... it can also impress by its dignity. This is does easily ... and without external prearrangements, because it holds the great middle. Therefore it arouses no unpleasant feelings."
- i ching
11-7
stay humble
write what comes
John – We’d like to wrap up final negotiations on your property by the end of the year so, if it’s still the plan, issue checks to your two tenants.
Can you provide Adrian and I an update on where things stand?
- marco
11-17
Thanks Marco.
We also like to wrap it up. But prior to making a conclusive advise on this, we need to ask few more questions.
1) what happens in distant future if airport is here no more. does the easement stays in effect forever ?
2) what if there nothing on the land. can port still make a permanent claim on the potential they can build a cell tower in future ?
3) if someone backyard planted a small tree which could in distant future become a hazard - does airport then have right to claim a permanent easement that would entitle them to enter/exit the property forever ?
4) and what if the property owner takes down the tree port identified to be hazard ? e.g. like ours - does airport still have a claim ?
Again, we are not trying to debate you on this, just that these are reasonable questions every property owners should ask.
John
11-17
we dont mind signing
but future guardians must give ok
let wait to hear back from them
*
what do the future guardians want us do ?
if we sign gathering ceases ; and
until they let us through ; we cant go forward
so if guardians need us in future ... ?
*
he wants gathering cease by end of year
we want him to let us through end of year
marco holds much power over a little file
- guardians
we telling them how we think by asking the questions
we ask them to answer in way an ordinary viewer/student/resident can understand
- the office
we telling them how we think by asking the questions
we ask them to answer in way an ordinary viewer/student/resident can understand
- the professor
leading the classmates
the classmates nods in agreement
John – thank you for questions.
I’ve shared them with Adrian Winter, the lawyer who responded to your past questions regarding the permanent easement. Expect a response from her shortly.
- Marco
Marco a nice person. We wish him happy thanksgiving
"Hi John – Apologies for my delayed response on this. I’ll be able to follow up with you at the beginning of next week.
Have a great weekend!
- Marco"
11-3-21
"Thanks Marco. i reminded my brother on the form. Look forward to your follow up.
you have a great weekend
John "
send him/them compassion
- guardians
*
Hi John,
I hope you had a good weekend. I’ve responded to your questions below. As a reminder, I represent the Port and you should feel free to seek your own independent legal counsel. Thanks.
1) what happens in distant future if airport is here no more. does the easement stays in effect forever ?
The easement is permanent and remains in effect until lawfully terminated. However, the Port would consider adding a provision to the easement that would provide for automatic termination in the unlikely event the Airport ceases to operate. The exact language would need to be vetted and approved by the Port, but the general concept is something the Port can consider.
2) what if there nothing on the land. can port still make a permanent claim on the potential they can build a cell tower in future ?
Yes. The Port seeks to prevent any type of interference, which would include structures, but also other types of interference coming from the property. The easement language provides some examples:
4. No Interference with Air Navigation. Grantor shall not authorize any use of the Property that would interfere with landing or taking-off ofaircraft at the Airport, or otherwise constitute an airport hazard. Such hazards include uses that create electrical interference with navigational signals or radio communication between the Airport and aircraft, make it difficult for pilots to distinguish between Airport lights and other lights, resultin glare in the eyes of pilots using the Airport, impair visibility in the vicinity of the Airport (such as smoke generating activities), create bird strikehazards or other hazardous wildlife attractants, operate drones or other manned or unmanned flying devices that may interfere with aircraft or the Airport, or other uses that in any way endanger or interfere with the landing, take-off or maneuvering of aircraft intending to use the Airport.
3) if someone backyard planted a small tree which could in distant future become a hazard - does airport then have right to claim a permanent easement that would entitle them to enter/exit the property forever ?
The Port’s rights to enter/exit the property are triggered by language in the easement for when a tree or other object exceeds the height limitation, at paragraph 3: “The Port shall have the continuing right to remove, mitigate, and prevent the erection or growth upon the Property of any tree, vegetation, structure, or other natural or artificial object that violates the height restrictions specified in Paragraph 2 above.”
4) and what if the property owner takes down the tree port identified to be hazard ? e.g. like ours - does airport still have a claim ?
The Port can still seek an easement to prevent any future airport hazards even if the property owner takes down the current obstructing trees. RCW 14.12.010; RCW 14.08.030.
Adrian Urquhart Winder (she/her)
Attorney
Foster Garvey PC
12-8-21
easy to enter outer not easy to exit inner
those already in will tell you
we give them every chance to withdraw
do they really want to enter more ?
- guardian
11-20
*
- both sides dont want to fight
"In such a case a wise and conciliatory attitude benefits the whole community, which will then not be drawn into the conflict."
- someone strong enough and just to lend weight to the right side
(maybe a high ranking leader; we just want what is fair)
"This refers to an arbiter in a conflict who is powerful and just, and strong enough to lend weight to the right side. A dispute can be turned over to him with confidence. If one is in the right, one attains great good fortune."
- no need seek decoration
we/they dont need to win
"Here we have someone who has carried a conflict to the bitter end and has triumphed. He is granted a decoration, but his happiness does not last. He is attacked again and again, and the result is conflict without end."
- i ching
11-22
*
"i dont think they have a claim"
-
"after trees trimmed
i dont think they have a claim
and i dont believe they think they do
if they doing this to everyone
no one alone can stand up to them
but if we ask for help
maybe people may gather/come"
- john
11-25
*
we to stay to what is fair
"Often it seems to a man as though everything were conspiring against him. He sees himself checked and hindered in his progress, insulted and dishonored. However, he must not let himself be misled; despite this opposition, he must cleave to the man with whom he knows he belongs. Thus, notwithstanding the bad beginning, the matter will end well."
- i ching
"this ends well"
- beef
you should just sign it
-
we willing to sign if they give an explanation
ethically they owe public a duty of good faith ?
now the trees trimmed
either the rules gives them the right or it does not
we just asking for what is fair
we waiting on their response
either way
we expect it be resolved this month
there no point to go beyond this
12-1-21
*
if marco/adrian in our posiiton
if outstanding airport staff
what would they do ?
"whatever you decide we will support
this gives us no burden"
- la lady
waiting on their response
my real questions
-
what do they really want ?
*
the only question we have
there a clear feeling on this so far
don't sign
the guardians need this in future ?
please help us
we need to get through
- guardians
12-3-21
.jpg)
i ching points to a middle helper
bring them together meeting - marco/adrian
then we will know what they really want
there two parts
1) permanent issue
2) whether they have easement claim over land without existing hazard
we deal with part 1 first
our apology to the outstanding counsel
nothing personal ; we just writing our position like she is
(1)
she not speaking as neutral observer
As a reminder, I represent the Port and you should feel free to seek your own independent legal counsel. Thanks.
(2)
if statute not meant to grant easement forever
e.g. after airport is here no more
then it not meant to be permanent ?
if so ...
what happens to the burden she speaks of ?
1) what happens in distant future if airport is here no more. does the easement stays in effect forever ?
The easement is permanent and remains in effect until lawfully terminated. However, the Port would consider adding a provision to the easement that would provide for automatic termination in the unlikely event the Airport ceases to operate. The exact language would need to be vetted and approved by the Port, but the general concept is something the Port can consider.
(3)
if so ...
without case precedent
this an issue for finders of fact ?
law school mock trial vs. south king county citizens
even if we may lose in law school
but if this goes before citizens to determine the interpretation of statute which applies to their land
then we dont know
and maybe airport also dont know ?
without case law as precedent to explain - both sides can interpret own ways
we really not interested in getting into a hair splitting debate on easement
and no will to keep this going
but if we sign, it will mean the dissolution of this gathering/page
so if guardians feel we have done enough
or they want us to do more
they need let us know
and if they not want us sign
the guardians need to look to airport
we done what we can
and does airport really want us to sign ?
we ask marco for little time
there much to take in here
12-8-21
we done our task ; our burden is lifted
one more round of question we do
and if they stay same
we sign
community loses an inner support
airport just doing their task
and we no need pay tenants from own pocket - they get paid either way
it is airport staff who decided to dissolve this movement
guardians allowing us to go
:)
pt defiance
12-8-21
marco only know inner push
he want be on top
leaning/relying on law firm for power
if we know certain they aint gonna do that
then we already won and no need to sign
the lawyer - she knows the power of inner retreat ; she gives no pressure
there power in that ; we learning from her
let go one more round
:)
12-9-21
on airport
whether airport has such claim against EVERY property owners within path - even without existing hazard ?
if it what they say - they proclaim it they entitled to it -
what there to stop them from abusing their power ?
we will work on that this coming week
12-16
*
you want me to keep stretching it ?
-
yes, keep going
- mr chee
even after almost year the discussion remains interesting and fresh ; but to keep it interesting i may have to go on offensive
-
yes, ok
- mr chee
you and i have an unique relationship ; we keep colliding but it always benefit/made me stronger better
- writer
mr chee smiles
12-19 nayas
let take a christmas break
get back to this after
happy holidays to marco/adrian
12-20
:)
*
they can't really complaint of us holding out because the statute was never meant to be forever and we had already offered them the conditional one they entitled
- but they refused our offer
"and once trees/hazrads are removed
now we ask whether the statute applies at all ?
this one may have far and wide implications for all property owners"
- chewpi news
*
if what they say is right about the statute :
once airport proclaim it
they entitled to it
then the judiciary can only help airport take the land
it cannot help people defend its necessity /question its integrity
but if it not really the intent of the statute - yet can be argued that way …
then … it would not be the type of representation writer would have made to an ordinary citizen
whether our client is airport or not
what others say on this ?
12-27-21
they don't need to advocate
but under the circumstances
do they owe a duty of good faith to the people ?
if so
at which point is this duty compromised ?
-
welcome to seatac/chewpiland
between lake/puget sound
the ever outstanding jim's detail
and the truck parkers of america
that be the first thing see in seatac if coming from the waterfront burien
maybe it airport now trying to send a message to itself
and by sending message to help itself in past
its own future also linked in to help itself present
what airport future saying to airport present to tell airport past today ?
which voice to listen to ?
*
maybe airport is listening
give them time to figure out which direction they want
there not much more we can do
they have the superior force
*
if guardians go on offense
it be from future and maybe with airport alliance ?
then that may change things present
if present changes
maybe we can then help the past ?
we dont know
something new to learn everyday
*
they know, and we will tell them
we have no interest to fight them
and if this a third world dictatorship
they would already have the easement
so we thank them for patience
*
our legal career started 1992
johnson slamming phone and no respect from no body
real estate the last/most boring legal study
yet this turning into our most interesting discussion
it within compassion
so if it ends this way
with among the nicest people
whether win/lose
it a good end
:)
12-14
jim e-mailed the power of attorney
we thank him for his patience
we asked for it just so we be in position
he still need to agree to its reasonableness
and this yet we made conclusive advice
*
we are now in position to sign the airport easement
what will it take ?
we will leave it for the future guardians to guide
we will follow
- the office
12-15-21
follow the writings this website
thee statute did not intend permanent easement
no judge jury will agree that the statute is meant forever
someone will always own the land but airport may not be here forever
and so the word permanent should not be part of easement
take what you need/given and don’t seek for more
that is where the line is drawn
micro of macro
this the root of the cause
1-1-22
in script/vision
office 2022 we will watch
office 2021 history will thank
the reverse of they have a claim but we dont is we have one they dont
- tony
we now between they may not have a claim and we may have a claim ?
- andrew
we thank the guardians and our supporters
- john
we yet to rival them inner
but we are getting closer ...
the office and staff bow with honor and respect
1-1-22
*
tony not here but mr chee be a good replacement
we like to hear what viewers think we should do
what would compassion do ?
if it different from what airport want us to do - we follow compassion
if it the same - we follow compassion
*
if guardians can help us block their reinforcements/force
whether through native spirit or seattle businesses uniting ...
then it be just
seatac residents vs. airport business
they would have to abide by reason
take only what statute gives
and not wait for us to submit because they have the use of the "force"
you get the point
- future guardians
1-2-22
power of root culture
strong root chakra gives feeling of safety
sense of abundance
with that sense of enough
one's actions become different
without it, ground not feel stable
no matter how much outer
hopis/natives as guardians
they can protect others
can also "tickle" the root chakras
of those who cross line
that also the one weakness of large law firms
they need strong root chakra to feel safe
we may have little or no claim
but some reason their root chakra cant rest
why ?
1-1-22
*
we updated the two tenants again on the status of the easement signing.
they outstanding tenants/friends.
1-3-22
the office
season 2
final chapter
The light of the body is the eye: if
therefore thine eye be single, thy
whole body shall be full of light.
mathew 6 :22
our sincere apology to marco
this has dragged on far too long
and he has shown upmost patience
but i believe by this time he and team understands our dilemma
*
we have finally complete our review of their response
our view :
the statute is straight forward :
there is (1) airport hazard : (2) airport hazard area
RCW 14.12.010
(3) reasonable and necessary
RCW 14.12.090
(1)
before tree trimmed
there was (1) airport hazard (2) within hazard area and (3) the determination was reasonable and necessary
but they want to make it "permanent " which we believed was not part of statute
(2)
after trees trimmed (late oct)
whether there still exists (1) hazard ; and whether (3) is reasonable and necessary
they will need to make new determination
1-5
Marco writes to us
he is pushing again for answer
we thank him for patience
1-10
here the real question :
say the year is 2030
and you all reading this writing
what would you advise us to do ?
is there something in future which needs this to keep going ?
*
the statute implies a reasonable and necessary" standard for determining if easement is necessary
now that trees are removed
just like any neighbor land and home owners along airport path
is it still necessary ?
*
and are they implying to us that once airport proclaim the easement
we cant question its reason / necessity ?
so if one owns a empty lot along the path
if one an ordinary citizen of region
is that what we are suppose to believe ?
1-11
if we dont sign
and they let us through
not only we pay tenants from own pocket
we also burdened with showing that there a future reason worth the cause
if we sign
then whatever happens in future
there be those pointing to this
so it a no win for either side
sign and/or not sign
so the answer is simple yet difficult
what would compassion do ?
the airport has no rights over seatac residents except for easement claims
and for that they should take only what is necessary
-
*
if high tech solar powered plane no need airfield to land
like helicopter landing
and planes like buses
then many company offer replacement to airport 0 it then no here any more
how long into future that tech arrive ?
*
how does this easement affect our future additions and/or renovations ?
they say it not - ask again
*
we ask guardians for advise/guidance
*
if the statute has a reasonable and necessity standard and they are representing it not
- we should not allow this to stop us
- chewpi news analyst 2030 #1
(e.g. your name here)
if the easement will burden future additions and renovations to the property
and they are representing to you it not
- we should not allow this to stop us
- chewpi news analyst 2030 #2
question is not whether they agree
but whether if this issue can go before the people and whether they want to discourage similar conduct in the future
- chewpi news analyst 2030 #3
the people and the leaders are behind us
-
1-11
"In advancing and in retreating,
The perseverance of a warrior furthers."
"In born gentleness is often carried to the point of indecisiveness. One does not feel strong enough to advance resolutely. A thousand doubts crop up; one is, however, not minded to withdraw but drifts indecisively to and fro. In such a situation, a military decisiveness is the proper thing, so that one resolutely does what order demands. Resolute discipline is far better than irresolute license."
- i ching
1-11-22
our inner attention 2021 should have been on defending / slowing the inner pandemic …
instead we used up half of our energy on this
now it has created a momentum
we should keep it going
and not allow adventitious force to cease it
- chewpi news 2030
1-11-22
John –
Following back up on the email you received from Adrian Winder.
Assuming you’ve worked out the power of attorney situation, can we send you a final permanent easement agreement that you can review and sign?
Thank you.
Marco Milanese
1-10-22
*
Hey thanks Marco.
Will give you a response by end of this week, if not earlier.
Happy new year. Now we know each other long, we becoming friends.
:)
John
1-10
*
the guardians future has spoken
we need to get past this
our apologies to marco.
*
our response :
Dear Marco :
Thanks for your patience.
As advisor, we need to make a honest and evaluation of the situation.
(1)
We make the following findings :
It a new situation and needs a new determination
Once the tress are removed, there are no more hazards identified by the port.
Even if there still exists a potential easement claim - This would need a new evaluation ; because it a new situation.
The statute is straight forward :
In summary : There are (1) airport hazard : (2) airport hazard area RCW 14.12.010
and (3) reasonable and necessary standard RCW 14.12.090.
Before trees were removed, we would agree on the reasonableness and necessity of an easement. Our disagreement was over whether the duration of it should be permanent.
But once the trees are removed, whether there still exists (1) hazard ; and whether (3) easement is reasonable and necessary, the port will need to make a new determination.
That is the only reasonable approach to this. The lot is now no different in hazard status from any other lots along the path.
As their advisor and as citizen of Seatac, it is important for us to know that any easement claims be based on reasonable and necessary standard implied and safeguarded by the statute. RCW 14.12.090.
We look forward to hear your view on this.
(2)
My brother e-mailed the power of attorney. We asked for it just so be in position. He still needs to agree to it.
Again, we reserve the right to a final review.
We thank you and we thank Adrian for her input and participation.
Please take care.
John
1-14-22
maybe compassion pulled us away from signing whereas every other wise and kind people would already have
it the inner feel upon reflection we know we stayed with it
*
it ok to lose patience/temper
compassion can express that
vs.
feel oneself too mature to do so
even if compassion wants us to fight them
"compassion is not one way rules and behavior"
"compassion is compassion"
- yolanda, the wise oracle
*
this airport siege is uniting neighbor bond
within compassion
we know how it is with the inner airport
e.g.
as inner
auburn people not taken by their small airport
even if it same outer statute
vs.
seatac people are much more under sized vs. this inner airport
*
we need to help writer early 2021
guardians keep pointing to this ...
why ?
future tells past to take it into august
we then take over
*
the power of compassion
a lone seatac resident standing firm against airport, because as inner
no one is cheering the airport on this
we have no reason to, but compassion calls
- whether that is true only the present can tell the past
*
we learning how to use the webpage to influence the wave
*
we going on the offensive
our team
so far
past month you've seen johnson's /nayas team offense
they got them bit scared
he master of turning no claim into a claim
andrew is neutral
the mediator airport look to for peace
*
so far
you've seen writer's defense
now his clown offense ...
1850 bc
in reverse/clown world
they are all cheering the airport on this
(1)
"if airport wants it
they can have it !"
-
yea, airport airport
-
they all cheer
(2)
if no reason no necessity
airport can still have it !
-
yea , whatever they want
-
they cheer
(3)
that $3000 is very good offer
-
yea, the absolute top offer
-
1-13-22
if airport willing to help us
we be grateful
eventually they entitled to an easement
whether it now or in future years when trees grow back
in vision it matters little
but it may be meaningful to take this momentum into next world with us
1-19-22
*
we post a two week no email response message to airport
so there no distractions
have a good lunar new year
:)
1-25
"sir, we have the red october back on the radar "
the submarine now has new carpet
and remodeled kitchen
1-20-22
on airport
we at standstill
but that could be a good thing
neither side can push the other in reasonable way
3d (outer) they have commanding superiority in resource ; 4d we have the edge/they cant out reason us before the people ; 5d is tug of war
they not being nice/mean
but just reacting to our show of strength
without it they be pushing us
that nature of this materialistic world
yet it helps great deal to have good relationship
day by day / week by week
we write what comes when they come
they have chosen to stand still for time being and we appreciate it ; given us chance to take care of what need done - keep this next wave to pg-13
good work guardians
- guardian chief
2-10-22
*
micro/macro
if we combine our inner forces
e.g.
the guardians and airport
then maybe we can rival something bigger
rather than seatac fighting within
seatac united to fight them without
- chewpi news
*
on airport - they have stayed still and we are thankful ; but we still stuck ; cant move our attention forward
until they make gesture of peace
e.g. pay tenants their portion (we no need get paid) or talk to us in person (we can pay tenants ourself)
we to stay with it
- guardians
maybe now we have the law/statute on our side ?
3-5
that what world needs most now
a peaceful inner resistance/counter balance movement
that the real antidote
- bison shaman
the sole panacea
- marco (chewpi vajra teacher)
*
it the commissioners the firm and the proclamation
vs. the statute and the people of seatac
2-2-22
*
win/lose/something else
if both sides want win
they both battle for the winner spot
- if just win or lose
then someone will take the seat
but if enter something else
then the inner seat belongs to airport
the loser seat is empty
if airport knows how to enter something else, then there no winner/loser needed
otherwise, what over wins will not have the polar over lose to support it ...
*
march guardians to gather
we reaching a plateau ?
where we need not only play defense
from there it just a beginning
we need to go back to past to help ourselves
there much need be done
2-24-22
just as their always two inner factions in each world
the fong chi world is not without its bitter and heated rivalries ...
the upside down faction vs. the downside up faction
they like the no more normal vs. more more normal
it depends on who normal is
who is down who is up
11-11-96 chewpi
chewpi news
"we walking on the edge"
- alvin
chewpi comedy club
pg - 13
you know why russians say they invented humor ?
-
why ?
- audience
"because the russians are funny"
-
someone wise once explained
china uses taiwan to channel the inner lack of the people ; if that is fulfilled, the inner lack will not have an outer focus
what peaks ages
he also mentions that under deng
they applied sage as counsel
and uses the i ching principal to guide
not sure it that way today
*
taiwan china just need to walk the middle
and not allow the inner extreme pull too far
*
putin enjoys highest approval rating
he no need tip balance unless necessary
in world
in time of economic sensitivity
there a middle way all three sides can walk
*
it all happens in america
the progressive left is overtaking the middle democrats
the mandate issue creating a new faction within repulblicans
there is not a left vs. right
but far left/right pulling the middle out
once there too much weight on both ends
the "ridge pole sags to the breaking point"
*
some inner force
pulling taiwan go too ast one way
maybe the far right in america
the vaccinated ones
*
if zhong xiao party rise
jiang yi der president candidate
we can maintain a fine balance between all three parties
in the mean time
bring attention to the world
a new taiwan china relationship
1-31-22
wuwei wu buwei
when a situation not have solution in both polarity
clear the root
the rest (outer luminosity) takes care itself
- 1850 bc guardians
2-24-22
*
alternative view
"they want you to look else where"
if circle controls a bigger circle
then the ruling circle not making the call
they just actors
if so ... then the real reason behind the action
we yet to know
*
that good news in a way
that we only need to change those behind the circle
maybe that what they want see
to not focus on them, but away ?
*
like the airport
we still looking for the circle behind the circle
until we find that, this stand still persists
half of our focus/attention remains with defending
leaving half to keep watch on the next wave
*
our future tells us ...
the guardians have taken them
this a vision
yet it the wave of that vision which is causing them in other worlds
we rival it here
we rival it there
we will never get this close in other worlds
only this - the world of compassion
good work guardians
stay with it
3-1-22
as inner, if this a vision/dream ...
then news is a program
whether we get pulled is more important than whether we accept it
any underlying movement which divide space from non space is second floor
*
e.g. airport micro of macro
once we as circle neutralize it as inner
then we see it at work - the outer result of our inner movement past year
we less divided
airport/firm.marco and chewpiland/office/writer
that an inner formula/strategy of our work today - micro and so macro
- guardians
you get the point
*
as inner
"it a tug of war of inner authority
in an inner wild west"
- nayas customer #1
as inner
"airport loses the claim on the statute
it is now even"
- naya customer #2
yes
if want to help against far left
best way is to support middle democrats
- customer #3
*
seize fire with airport is wise for both sides
we can then focus in on influencing a distant past to change what has taken us to this present
3-7-22
*
write what comes
writer asked to hold back from paying tenants himself
guardians not to retreat until tenants paid by airport
3-28
*
until we reach the root person/cause
we be playing right into his/her hand
reach the root/capture the leader
all issues it created uprooted in this vision
*
the circle/person behind this airport
the guardians taken him/them ?
we can begin to fight in your/our future
and/or you can reveal yourself
- guardians
4-20-22
*
the being/person/spirit behind the creation of airport vision
do you think they linked/know the circle behind the pandemic vision ?
do you think they also know the circle behind ... the false inner body vision ?
there is a solution
but we need to shift our view from what they want you to see
- guardians
6-3
the guardians are in his world
so they equal there
*
all they need is for us to anchor down within into the world of compassion
leave the rest to the guardians here there everywhere
writer not the only one working for the office
it multiple worlds network
we do non action until guardians gives the message
*
airport is an ally in circle b
that what their future says to us ?
we to team up to transform/change/neutralize the 21st century waves
*
but first
writer to return/enter circle a
and exit circle b
and then he will re-enter circle b with a new view
strengthening the alliance
we can use all the help
6-20
5-24
it may be as little as putting drops water on mounting fire ; but we do what we can so there is no blame /regret
-
sometimes it is the effort that matters
- bison
5-25
- we write what comes
the future wants two sides to teamwork ?
5-28
"he has the welfare of all countries at heart"
- i ching
*
this vision/training simulation
people are self appearances
future is showing us how to deal with these situations in a pg - 13 way on wave level
the future thanks the airport
guardians bow with honor and respect
6-2
*
no airport
port legal has inner/outer
to combat its inner
1. no pvf
"No Portlegal no Virus no File"
2. ask our 1992 penn legal graduates on this 30th reunion
to gather inner to counter port legal
3. ghost dancers get ready
*
the future guardians have taken marco ?
he would know
*
writer is then free to sign it
writer will be rewarded in own way
- guardian
4-13
they havent responded to our previous letter (1-14)
so not sure yet how to interpret this one
we ask for guidance
4-18
without identifiable hazard
can airport just take any land it proclaims ?
or do they need show reason and necessity ?
it a question every property owner wants to know
we like to hear from viewers
*
waiting on check from airport
- 7-1
check from airport received
7-15
Hi Marco
Yes, the check did arrive today and it was sent July 7, as Dave had indicated.
Thank you for being kind and patient throughout this long process. Still owe you that cup of coffee - anytime.
It has been a honor working with you. You take care my friend.
John Chu
Great news John. And yes – I will certainly take you up on the cup of coffee. It’s been a long road, but it’s finally done. Thank you for your partnership. Marco
7-15
*
maybe they will miss us ; maybe even a few may wish there more citizens like us. they are good people
we bow with honor and respect
:)
7-15
now we know they all of the same circle
and want to keep the show going
they should let us direct this
elevating compassion
if our relationship in march a 4
it now a 6
there more compassion
and if this helps both sides accumulate compassion
it a good path
the battle is for benefit of others and future
and in that way so it helps ourself
(1)
we can create a tv show
soap opera factual fiction that simple take what we have here ...
and then write a script into it and we each starting acting the script - each first agree to script
(a)
e.g. tale of writer running into lawyer adrian downtown but they both not knowing who other is
after dinner cafe/bar
she is reviewing the file written by this seatac resident questions about potential easement purchases airport interest in making
somehow they got talking ...
(b)
marco a buddhist teacher of vajrayana
he gives talks at the tibetan temple
chewey didnt know until ...
(writer will write the script/teaching)
12-19
"Mr. Chu – I hope all is well.
The Port is getting close to completing this phase of the Flight Corridor Safety Program and you are the last property owner that the Port does not have a permanent easement with.
Port legal is in the process of solidifying the Port’s next steps and so it would be good to know as soon as possible whether your family intends to sign or not.
I believe it would be best to talk by phone at your earliest convenience. Can you please provide me with a phone number to reach you at and a good time to call early next week? And you can always reach out to me directly as well. My cell number is below. "
Marco
4-8
*
they havent responded to our previous letter (1-14)
so not sure yet how to interpret this one
we ask for guidance
*
Marco
Go ahead and forward the final easement to us. If that works out, I will advise the easement be signed.
John
4-18
on the guardians
the question they pose is this :
obviously, this a vision and it just symbolic/training
no one is really interested in an easement
but what if ...
the future knows what is causing the future conflict and needs someone - like us - to enter to dispel/neutralize it
e.g. this 1930's japan and some organization need be stopped when it still small or it will mount into ...
and/or
e.g.
this tibet / china 1920's and something is causing the future to unfold that way ...
it always first the underlying pattern society allowed to get imbalanced ... then there always be people/organizations to fulfill the outer
"what appears small at first ..."
everything can be traced to a small inner beginning
who can future look to ... ?
what can anyone do then/now ...
- guardians
many are called but few responds
those who do, we believe, future will go out their way to reward them in own ways
the future is now
- chewpi news
many are called but few responds
- bison
on airport
we like to be friends
we bow with honor and respect
the guardians have spoken fully ?
we to take it to june 3
wait for their e-mail asking for it
then writer can mail it to them
it would free guardians and writer
we also owe marco an apology for taking so long to get this signed
we hope he understands we just middle messengers
we bow with honor and respect
:)
6-6
*
so it comes down to same people behind everything in this vision
*
we mail it out - will write marco tomorrow
a old chapter closes
we thank the airport
6-15
airport wins ; we lose
our office
-no recovery no fees
so no fees
- if you challenge our office
you are certain to win
4-22
we not here to win
guardians to stay with it
*
dont know
what this page has anything to do with anything
our task only to write what comes
we are just the messenger
4-22-22
future message : good work
you will be rewarded
they have seen your defense but we yet to see if he can play defense
- bison
with airport
we can still take it back - they misrepresented the statutes
with dot
we can go direct to vision maker
show that it a mental scam
and it can also be reversed - just a signature
and just matter of time
we now know it a mental scam and all that pretending to be dutiful to "do their job" is another mental scam
we only need write what comes
3-25-24
